dARksOUL.dll

Hey there,
Recently A 32 year old man with his wife and baby were walking down a street. Then a man who looked really messed up walked up to them and threw SULFURIC ACID at the both of them including there BABY. They all three got BAD BURNS and the baby is still in urgent care. But they are still trying to figure out how long the guy deserves. How long do you think?


My Opinion: I say death penalty. I think he did a very Sick and Twisted act.

Phoenix

Erm, I'd like more information on the man.
Was he intoxicated, and does he have any illnesses?

deve8tor

this is why i think public executions should be reinstated....

Kazn

According to the Consitution, the government is not allowed to inflict unfair punishments.
Both of them will survive.
Chances are, he will face 5-15 years.

k.Wasser

Good post. It sounds like a case of schizophrenia, with no real motive. Bad post. Please avoid one-liners without content. I would originally just delete your post, but I believe making a public mockery of it serves better, and it's also a bit ironic.

I as well wish to know the source of this event, any unbiased local news source or official police report would do fine.

b4kill

I think he should be jailed for life. Like wth. Throw acid at a baby? Mezzed up guy.

vinny1729

You know that citizens are paying for him staying in jail. We're paying for criminals to live. Unless he has a mental disorder, death penalty should be given. Three people's lives were damaged because of sulfuric acid contacting there face. Their eyesight may be damaged, their taste buds may be damaged, and it might of even went up their nose.

k.Wasser

Putting one man on death row costs more than incarcerating him for 40 years. Capital punishment also has moralistic issues, and it is increasingly becoming unused and banned for moral and economic reasons.

Exoduss

everybody will survive, he won't get life, i say 10-20 years

MoMoney

I Think Death Cause He Just Fucked Up A Child And Thats Like Scaring Him And He Was Prob A Hobo So Death Cause Jail Would Be Good For Him He Would Have Meals And Shit

k.Wasser

Stop Typing Like This. You ignored all of the replies and only confronted the main point. I've already spoken about this, and so have other people. In a debate, your position is to refute or support. You have only put forth your own duplicated answer, and backed it by saying having "meals" is a good thing for a person. Your comparison here makes no sense and is simply not at all connected with the crime itself. You are saying prison would be (too) good for this person because he will be fed. That is a pathetic excuse for a reason to kill someone rather than incarcerating them.

Injection

Agreed. This is a sick and twisted deed; but thankfully no one was killed.
Not a life sentence, death roll, just 10-20 years is good enough torture. Don't drop the soap.